Get Channel Active Again After 3 Copyright Strikes
A copyright strike on YouTube
YouTube copyright strike is a copyright policing practice used by YouTube for the purpose of managing copyright infringement and complying with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.[i] The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is the basis for the design of the YouTube copyright strike arrangement.[i] For YouTube to retain DMCA safe harbor protection, it must answer to copyright infringement claims with a discover and take down procedure.[ane] YouTube'southward own practice is to upshot a "YouTube copyright strike" on the user defendant of copyright infringement.[1] When a YouTube user gets hit with a copyright strike, they will be required to scout a warning video about the rules of copyright and have trivia questions about the danger of copyright.[2] When a YouTube user has three copyright strikes, YouTube terminates that user's YouTube channel, including whatsoever associated channels that the user have, removes all of their videos from that user's YouTube channel, and prohibits that user from creating another YouTube aqueduct.[ane] [3]
YouTube assigns strikes based on reports of copyright violations from bots.[four]
Some users have expressed business organisation that the strike process is unfair to users.[5] The complaint is that the system assumes guilt of YouTube users and takes the side of copyright holders even when no infringement has occurred.[5]
YouTube and Nintendo were criticised by Cory Doctorow, a writer for the blog Boing Boing, due to them reportedly treating video game reviewers unfairly past threatening them with strikes.[half-dozen]
Reasons for strikes [edit]
Disagreements near what constitutes off-white utilize [edit]
Fair use is a legal rationale for reusing copyrighted content in a limited manner, such as to discuss or criticize other media. Various YouTube creators have reported receiving copyright strikes for using media in the context of off-white use.[7]
Suppression of criticism [edit]
YouTube creators have reported receiving copyright strikes on videos that are disquisitional of corporate products. They assert that copyright violation, in this context, has been used as a strategy to suppress criticism.[8]
Strikes for posting ain work [edit]
Copyright strikes have likewise been issued against creators themselves.[9] Miracle of Sound's channel was striking with multiple copyright strikes equally a result of automated strikes past the distributor of their own music.[10]
Strikes for works in the public domain [edit]
In a similar incident to such strikes, though in another forum, Sony issued an automated copyright strike against James Rhodes for a video on Facebook of him playing part of a piece by Bach, on the grounds that they owned the copyright on a similar recording, and when the strike was challenged, asserted that they owned the rights to the work, before finally albeit that Bach's compositions are in the public domain. [11]
Strikes for unknown reasons [edit]
Some publishers on YouTube report non understanding why they have received strikes.[12]
This may chronicle to the fact 99.95 percentage of DMCA takedown notices are actually sent at random URLs that could take existed (valid format) but is not really used at all at the indicate in time the takedown notice is sent. This is the work of bots having no valid claims to any copyright, trying to carpet bomb DMCA notices for various illegal reasons such as trying to ruin a competitor. [xiii]
References [edit]
- ^ a b c d east Electronic Frontier Foundation (six February 2009). "A Guide to YouTube Removals". Electronic Frontier Foundation . Retrieved 13 July 2016.
- ^ Roe, Mike (Apr xiv, 2011). "Google hires Happy Tree Friends to explain copyright to YouTube uploaders". KPCC.
- ^ "Copyright strike nuts". YouTube . Retrieved xvi July 2018.
- ^ Douglas, Nick (24 January 2018). "You Can't Fool YouTube's Copyright Bots". Lifehacker.
- ^ a b staff (21 May 2010). "Is YouTube's iii-strike rule fair to users?". BBC News. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
- ^ Cory Doctorow (Mar 27, 2015). "Youtube and Nintendo conspire to steal from game superfans". Boing Boing . Retrieved 13 July 2016.
- ^ Alexander, Julia (3 April 2018). "YouTubers voice concerns over hefty Universal Pictures copyright strikes". Polygon.
- ^ Eordogh, Fruzsina (ane September 2018). "TikTok's Owners Falsely Copyright Strike Criticism Of App". Forbes.
- ^ Weiss, Geoff (6 July 2018). "YouTube Guitarist Claims He Got A Copyright Strike For Infringing Upon His Own Song - Tubefilter". Tubefilter.
- ^ Lemon, Marshall (19 Dec 2013). "YouTube Issued Copyright Claims Confronting Miracle of Sound". The Escapist. Retrieved 23 October 2016.
- ^ Doctorow, Cory (5 September 2018). "The future is here today: you can't play Bach on Facebook considering Sony says they ain his compositions". BoingBoing.
- ^ Klepek, Patrick (27 Oct 2015). "Atlus Keeps Hitting Tiny YouTube Channels With Copyright Strikes". Kotaku Australia.
- ^ Techdirt article on artificial DMCA takedown on invalid URLs being the bulk | https://world wide web.techdirt.com/manufactures/20170223/06160336772/google-report-9995-percent-dmca-takedown-notices-are-bot-generated-bullshit-buckshot.shtml
External links [edit]
- Copyright strike nuts in YouTube Assist
- How to Dispute a Strike -- DMCA Process Explained by h3h3Productions
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_copyright_strike
Post a Comment for "Get Channel Active Again After 3 Copyright Strikes"